Comparative evaluation judgement of psychiatric and psychologic expertise : towards a systematic method of evaluation

This task tries to establish a method of selection of experts in a peculiar field: children sexual abuses declarations and the one of guilty responsability degree of mental sick persons. Usually courts ought to select experts only by nomination and cooptation of professionals simply with a diploma of psychology or psychiatry. We used a combined model. The first selects between experts the best ones with two mains skills discrimination and consistency and the second one explores credibility declarations of children between five and twelve about sexual abuses. Measuring the performance is the task. Then wa have compared these results to those of other groups of general population in a democracy worry. We noticed that professors and other practioners in law or psychology or psychiatry can perform as good as professional experts.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Source https://theses.hal.science/tel-00797850
Author Ferracci, Ange-Bernard
Maintainer CCSD
Last Updated May 13, 2026, 09:40 (UTC)
Created May 13, 2026, 09:40 (UTC)
Identifier NNT: 2012TOU20063
Language fr
Rights https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1/
contributor Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie (CLLE-ERSS) ; École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE) ; Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J) ; Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Université Bordeaux Montaigne (UBM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
creator Ferracci, Ange-Bernard
date 2012-09-21T00:00:00
harvest_object_id c0c241a7-1c7d-4f83-b344-611028379a49
harvest_source_id 3374d638-d20b-4672-ba96-a23232d55657
harvest_source_title test moissonnage SELUNE
metadata_modified 2026-03-31T00:00:00
set_spec type:THESE