Territorial intelligence is also networking! Which strategies could be adopted to create a learning community regarding a public place?

Although tools and methods are of major importance for territorial intelligence, each action research begins with the creation of a network of actors and researchers. How to do this? Which strategies are the most efficient and ethically acceptable? The paper analyses how stakeholders of a public place were joined to work together on a new approach of management and use of a certain public place. It compares the different networking strategies used in the five case studies of the Topozym action research.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Source 6th International Conference of Territorial Intelligence "Tools and methods of Territorial Intelligence", Besançon, 2008
Author Schmitz, Serge, de Graef, Sarai, Ericx, Michel, Scheers, Luc, Noirhomme, Stéphane, Dalimier, Isabelle, Verheyen, Chris, Philippot, Marc, Partoune, Christine, van Hecke, Etienne
Maintainer CCSD
Last Updated May 5, 2026, 12:32 (UTC)
Created May 5, 2026, 12:32 (UTC)
Identifier halshs-00985679
Language en
Rights https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1/
contributor Service d'étude en Géographie économique Fondamentale et Appliquée (SEGEFA) ; Université de Liège = University of Liège = Universiteit van Luik = Universität Lüttich (ULiège)
coverage Besançon, France
creator Schmitz, Serge
date 2008-10-15T00:00:00
harvest_object_id 1245d1fb-3109-40f4-87db-f0dfb53389c4
harvest_source_id 3374d638-d20b-4672-ba96-a23232d55657
harvest_source_title test moissonnage SELUNE
metadata_modified 2026-04-10T00:00:00
set_spec type:COMM