The Etiological Theory of Function and Niko Tinbergen's Four Questions

Tinbergen (1963) demarcated four types of questions which can be asked about a trait. In particular, he distinguished studies bearing on the function of a trait and those aiming at unravelling its evolution. I will examine whether the etiological theory of function can accommodate this important distinction. I will question the adequacy of a historical framework to conceptualize functional explanations in some areas of evolutionary biology and propose that an ahistorical fitness account is more appropriate.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Source XXIIe International Congress of History of Science
Author Lorne, Marie-Claude
Maintainer CCSD
Last Updated May 14, 2026, 08:01 (UTC)
Created May 14, 2026, 08:01 (UTC)
Identifier halshs-00791301
Language en
contributor Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST) ; Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS-PSL (DEC) ; École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL) ; Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL) ; Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
coverage Pékin, China
creator Lorne, Marie-Claude
date 2005-07-24T00:00:00
harvest_object_id c14e1d21-54af-4bf2-8ddd-2cfffe819e80
harvest_source_id 3374d638-d20b-4672-ba96-a23232d55657
harvest_source_title test moissonnage SELUNE
metadata_modified 2024-12-09T00:00:00
set_spec type:COMM