Se taire, nier ou s'excuser : comment répondre à un appel au boycott ?

This study deals with the process underlying the impact of three crisis communication strategies - silence, deny and apology - identified in the literature, on boycott intent and buying intent. The case investigated is a boycott request concerning the use of chemical products on meat sold by a supermarket. Results show that depending the target, the firm should deny or apology and that silence is an underperforming strategy.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Source ISSN: 0779-7389
Author Capelli, Sonia, Legrand, Pascal, Sabadie, William
Maintainer CCSD
Last Updated May 14, 2026, 12:46 (UTC)
Created May 14, 2026, 12:46 (UTC)
Identifier halshs-00787774
Language fr
Rights https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1/
contributor Centre de Recherche Clermontois en Gestion et Management (CRCGM) ; Université d'Auvergne - Clermont-Ferrand I (UdA)-École Supérieure de Commerce (ESC) - Clermont-Ferrand (ESC Clermont-Ferrand)
creator Capelli, Sonia
date 2012-11-01T00:00:00
harvest_object_id b10d5d67-3c53-422f-b373-ee1f4a5a5e28
harvest_source_id 3374d638-d20b-4672-ba96-a23232d55657
harvest_source_title test moissonnage SELUNE
metadata_modified 2025-10-24T00:00:00
set_spec type:ART