Comments on ''Improving the computing efficiency of HPC systems using a combination of proactive and preventive checkpoint''

In this short note, we provide some comments on the recent paper ''Improving the computing efficiency of HPC systems using a combination of proactive and preventive checkpointing'' by Bouguerra et al.. We start by identifying some errors in their equations. Then we explain that they do not actually use the distribution of lead times, contrary to statements by the authors. Finally, we show that their algorithm does not change policy at the best possible moment, and we point to our own work~\cite{rr-journal-prediction} for the (correct version of the) optimal algorithm.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Source https://inria.hal.science/hal-00836629
Author Aupy, Guillaume, Robert, Yves, Vivien, Frédéric, Zaidouni, Dounia
Maintainer CCSD
Last Updated May 10, 2026, 15:26 (UTC)
Created May 10, 2026, 15:26 (UTC)
Identifier Report N°: RR-8318
Language en
Rights https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1/
contributor Laboratoire de l'Informatique du Parallélisme (LIP) ; École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon) ; Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL) ; Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
creator Aupy, Guillaume
date 2013-06-21T00:00:00
harvest_object_id 0ba11d91-cf74-410f-8fa6-b7a5ca17e088
harvest_source_id 3374d638-d20b-4672-ba96-a23232d55657
harvest_source_title test moissonnage SELUNE
metadata_modified 2025-10-13T00:00:00
set_spec type:REPORT