Can Uncertainty Justify Overlapping Policy Instruments to Mitigate Emissions?

This article constitutes a new contribution to the analysis of overlapping instruments to cover the same emission sources. Using both an analytical and a numerical model, we find that when the risk that the CO2 price drops to zero and the political unavailability of a CO2 tax (at least in the European Union) are taken into account, it can be socially beneficial to implement an additional instrument encouraging the reduction of emissions, for instance a renewable energy subsidy. Our analysis has both a practical and a theoretical purpose. It aims at giving economic insight to policymakers in a context of increased uncertainty concerning the future stringency of the European Emission Trading Scheme. It also gives another rationale for the use of several instruments to cover the same emission sources, and shows the importance of accounting for corner solutions in the definition of the optimal policy mix.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Source FEEM Working Paper
Author Lecuyer, Oskar, Quirion, Philippe
Maintainer CCSD
Last Updated May 12, 2026, 09:09 (UTC)
Created May 12, 2026, 09:09 (UTC)
Identifier hal-00801927
Language en
Rights https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1/
contributor centre international de recherche sur l'environnement et le développement (CIRED) ; Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-AgroParisTech-École nationale des ponts et chaussées (ENPC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
creator Lecuyer, Oskar
date 2012-05-12T00:00:00
harvest_object_id 2dedbaa3-d639-4cde-9bd1-f5448e0fe7a5
harvest_source_id 3374d638-d20b-4672-ba96-a23232d55657
harvest_source_title test moissonnage SELUNE
metadata_modified 2025-10-01T00:00:00
set_spec type:ART