The efficiency of the crude oil markets: Evidence from variance ratio tests

This study examines the random walk hypothesis for the crude oil markets, using daily data over the period 1982-2008. The weak-form efficient market hypothesis for two crude oil markets (UK Brent and US West Texas Intermediate) is tested with non-parametric variance ratio tests developed by [Wright J.H., 2000. Alternative variance-ratio tests using ranks and signs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 18, 1-9] and [Belaire-Franch J. and Contreras D., 2004. Ranks and signs-based multiple variance ratio tests. Working paper, Department of Economic Analysis, University of Valencia] as well as the wild-bootstrap variance ratio tests suggested by [Kim, J.H., 2006. Wild bootstrapping variance ratio tests. Economics Letters, 92, 38-43]. We find that the Brent crude oil market is weak-form efficiency while the WTI crude oil market seems to be inefficiency on the 1994-2008 sub-period, suggesting that the deregulation have not improved the efficiency on the WTI crude oil market in the sense of making returns less predictable.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Source ISSN: 0301-4215
Author Charles, Amélie, Darné, Olivier
Maintainer CCSD
Last Updated May 15, 2026, 12:37 (UTC)
Created May 15, 2026, 12:37 (UTC)
Identifier hal-00771081
Language en
Rights https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1/
contributor Audencia Business School
creator Charles, Amélie
date 2009-05-15T00:00:00
harvest_object_id 5e56c0e3-ddf0-4971-b32f-b3054f6ae9d3
harvest_source_id 3374d638-d20b-4672-ba96-a23232d55657
harvest_source_title test moissonnage SELUNE
metadata_modified 2025-06-04T00:00:00
relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.026
set_spec type:ART