Peer feedback content and senders competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?
type: Dataset
description: Peer feedback content is a core component of peer assessment, but the impact of various contents of feedback is hardly studied. Participants in the study were 89 graduate students who were assigned to four experimental and a control group. Experimental groups received a scenario with Concise General (CGF) or Elaborated Specific (ESF) feedback by a high or low competent peer. ESF by a high competent peer was perceived as more adequate, but led to more negative affect. Students in CGF groups outperformed ESF groups during treatment. Groups with a low competent peer outperformed groups with a high competent peer during the posttest. Feedback perceptions and performance were uncorrelated. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475209000760)
issued: 2026-05-16T05:33:25.836020
language: en
modified: 2026-05-16T05:33:25.836026
contact point: Organization
  fn: CCSD
keyword: feedback-content
keyword: feedback-perceptions
keyword: infoeiahcomputer-science-cstechnology-for-human-learning
keyword: infoeu-reposemanticsarticle
keyword: journal-articles
keyword: peer-assessment
keyword: peer-feedback
keyword: shseduhumanities-and-social-scienceseducation
keyword: text-revision
landing page: 0959-4752

Peer feedback content and senders competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?
type: Distribution
format: HTML
issued: 2026-05-16T05:33:25.888232
modified: 2026-05-16T05:33:25.801677
access URL: https://hal.science/hal-00703922

test_moissonnage_selune
type: Agent